Useful automation
We automate the repetitive admin that eats into the working day, such as chasing documents and typing the same data twice, inside the way your business already runs. AI is used selectively. People review AI output and approve the decisions that matter.
Who it is for. Teams whose time goes on chasing, sorting and re-typing, and who want that taken off people without losing control of decisions.
01The problem
02What it includes
Each is scoped per project.
03See an example
Typical build, scoped per project.
Variation request V-17Example client A, Site 2
04What you get
05Where it fits
Illustrative scenario
Requests, approvals and expiries that depend on people remembering. Each line is a typical build, scoped per project. Not a customer project.
TodayRequests arrive by email and phone.
With one connected systemA request is logged with who raised it.
TodayApprovers are chased by message.
With one connected systemThe approver is reminded automatically.
TodayNobody can say who agreed what.
With one connected systemEach approval records who agreed and when.
TodayExpiring certificates are noticed late.
With one connected systemA reminder goes out before the expiry.
TodayThe weekly summary is built by hand.
With one connected systemA summary is drafted from the records for a person to check and approve.
Sectors this can be configured for: Construction, Telecoms, Facilities management, Commercial cleaning.
Does this look like how your business runs today?
06What might it cost
Automating one process can sit in a Starter System. Work that spans several departments or systems, or uses AI workflows, may fit Advanced / Enterprise.
Hosting and support are agreed with you up front. We don't publish figures for them because they depend on what is built.
Tell us about your process in the form. We reply to set up a short conversation to talk through the scope level that fits and what it is likely to cost.
07How we deliver it
We look at where time goes on repetitive admin and pick the one or two tasks that would make the biggest difference.
We separate the steps that follow clear rules from the ones that need human judgement, and decide what stays with people.
You see the proposed flow, including where a person reviews and approves, before anything is switched on.
We build plain rules and reminders first, use AI only where it earns its place, and test each stage with you.
We start with one process while people check the output, and extend it only when the first step has proved useful.
Not sure where to start? That is what the review is for.
08Questions
No. Many tasks are better handled by plain rules, reminders and workflows. AI is used selectively, where it genuinely helps, for example reading a document or drafting a summary for someone to check.
No. People review AI output and approve the decisions that matter.
Integrations are scoped per project. Whether a connection is practical depends on the other system, and we say so plainly during scoping rather than assume it.
Hosting, support, third-party licences and any AI usage charges are scoped per project and are agreed with you, not assumed. They are separate from the cost of building the automation.
With one process that you can describe in a few sentences and that someone dislikes doing. The free operational review is the place to find it.
Next step
Ask for a free 20 to 30 minute review. We will look at where repetitive work sits in your business and tell you honestly which parts are worth automating.